MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133495728 · doi:10.1109/led.2005.854356

Temporary extrusion failures in accelerated lifetime tests of copper interconnects

2005· article· en· W2133495728 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electron Device Letters · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCopper Interconnects and Reliability
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectromigrationExtrusionCopper interconnectMaterials scienceFailure mode and effects analysisCopperShort circuitMetallurgyLeakage (economics)Composite materialVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel electromigration failure mode was detected in 0.13-μm technology, copper dual damascene interconnects. Extrusions formed between the test lead and neighboring monitor lines, resulting in short-circuit failure. However, many of these extrusions were short lived, shrinking within a period of a minute to an hour. These phenomena indicated that a temporary "soft failure" existed in accelerated copper electromigration tests in addition to the traditional permanent failure or "hard failure." These soft failures would be missed unless short sampling intervals (less than a minute) and continuous monitoring of the leakage current between test metal lines and neighboring circuits were carried out. Consistent with our experimental results, physical modeling suggested that capillary forces were able to rupture a long and narrow extrusion and the electric field across the extrusion could accelerate this process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it