MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133532825 · doi:10.1515/ans-2009-0109

On a Fourth Order Elliptic Problem with a Singular Nonlinearity

2009· article· en· W2133532825 on OpenAlexafffund
Daniele Cassani, João Marcos do Ó, Nassif Ghoussoub

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Nonlinear Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoPacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsBiharmonic equationMathematicsDirichlet boundary conditionNonlinear systemOrder (exchange)Ball (mathematics)Mathematical analysisPure mathematicsSpace (punctuation)Dirichlet problemBoundary value problemPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study the following semilinear biharmonic equation: , where 0 ≤ f ≤ 1 and B R ⊂ ℝ N , N ≥ 1, is the ball centered in the origin of radius R. We prove, under Dirichlet boundary conditions u = Әu/Әƞ = 0 on ӘB R , the existence of λ* = λ*(R, f) > 0 such that for λ ∈ (0, λ*) there exists a minimal (classical) solution u̲ λ < which satisfies 0 < u̲ λ < 1. In the extremal case λ = λ*, we prove the existence of a weak solution which has finite energy and which is the unique solution even in a very weak sense. For λ > λ* there are no solutions of any kind. Estimates on λ*, stability properties of solutions and nonexistence results in the whole space are also established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations58
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Nonlinear StudiesSame topicNonlinear Partial Differential EquationsFrench-language works237,207