MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133537407 · doi:10.1109/csicc.2009.5349361

Multi parametric optimized architectural synthesis of an application specific processor

2009· article· en· W2133537407 on OpenAlexafffund
Summit Sehgal, Reza Sedaghat, Anirban Sengupta, Zhipeng Zeng

Bibliographic record

Venue2009 14th International CSI Computer Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEmbedded Systems Design Techniques
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersCMC MicrosystemsOntario Innovation Trust
KeywordsComputer scienceEmbedded systemApplication-specific integrated circuitField-programmable gate arrayThroughputOverhead (engineering)SoftwareSystem on a chipComputer architectureComputer hardwareProcess (computing)WirelessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advancements in the field of multimedia and wireless communications have led to a wide array of application and services requiring high data processing rate at minimal power consumption. This new generation of data hungry portable devices requires power efficient hardware solutions where the operational specifications are as important as objective functionality. Conventional processing solutions like MIPS fall short on real time computational intensive operations due to large software overhead. This class of applications demands dedicated hardware units like Application Specific Processors (ASP) working as hardware accelerators for intensive data processing operations. In this paper we describe a novel Register Transfer Level (RTL) synthesis process of a power and throughput optimized ASP for a sample application. The ASP implemented on an FPGA, can serve as a hardware accelerator for system on chip (SOC) or as a standalone Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) at silicon level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2009 14th International CSI Computer ConferenceSame topicEmbedded Systems Design TechniquesFrench-language works237,207