MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133546546 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2008.4518298

A low complexity selective mapping to reduce intercarrier interference in OFDM systems

2008· article· en· W2133546546 on OpenAlexaff
A. Ghassemi, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingFast Fourier transformOrthogonalityInterference (communication)Carrier frequency offsetComputational complexity theoryComputer scienceFrequency offsetTransmitterOffset (computer science)Electronic engineeringFrequency-division multiplexingAlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematicsEngineeringChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of major drawbacks of orthogonal frequency division multiplexing is sensitivity to frequency offsets caused by a mismatch between the transmitter and receiver oscillators. This offset destroys the orthogonality of the sub-carriers and introduces intercarrier interference (ICI), reducing the system performance. Previously, selective mapping was considered for reducing the peak interference-to-carrier ratio (PICR). However, this technique has a high computational complexity due to multiple inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) and fast Fourier transform (FFT) operations. In this paper, we exploit the IFFT/FFT structure to generate phase rotated SLM sequences and obtain a low PICR. This technique significantly reduces the computational complexity while providing a PICR performance close to that of the previous SLM technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the ... IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechniquesFrench-language works237,207