Three polyphenol oxidases from hybrid poplar are differentially expressed during development and after wounding and elicitor treatment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The expression of three polyphenol oxidase (PPO; EC 1.10.3.1) genes was investigated in hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides). PtdPPO1 was previously isolated as a wound‐ and herbivore‐inducible PPO (Constabel et al. Plant Physiol 124: 285–295, 2000), whereas PtdPPO2 and PtdPPO3 are two novel hybrid poplar PPO genes isolated from stem and root tissue, respectively. Sequence analysis revealed that the three PPOs were 60–66% identical at the amino acid level. Using gene‐specific probes, the expression patterns of the three PPOs was investigated in various organs at different developmental stages. Under normal growing conditions, PtdPPO1 mRNA was absent from all organs tested, while PtdPPO2 was found to be expressed in mid‐veins, petioles, stems and roots. PtdPPO3 was expressed only in roots. PtdPPO1 and PtdPPO2 were induced by mechanical wounding and methyl jasmonate, but in different tissues. Overall, the expression patterns suggest that the three PPO genes may have specialized physiological functions in hybrid poplar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".