Inhibitory efficiencies for mechanism-based inactivators of sialidases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here we describe the measurement of the inactivation rate constants for the mechanism-based inactivator 2,3-difluorosialic acid acting upon the sialidase from Micromonospora viridifaciens. Using double mixing stopped-flow experiments conducted in a 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid buffer (100 mmol/L, pH 7.00) at 25 °C, the derived kinetic parameters are kinact/Ki = (3.9 ± 0.8) × 106 (mol/L)–1 s–1 and Ki = 1.7 ± 0.4 μmol/L. We demonstrate that the inhibitory efficiency of the inactivation event is similar to the catalytic efficiency for this sialidase acting upon a typical substrate, 4-methylumbelliferone α-d-sialoside, kcat/Km = (7.2 ± 2.8) × 106 (mol/L)–1 s–1. Furthermore, we show that the catalytic efficiencies for inactivation and hydrolysis by the Kdnase from Aspergillus fumigatus are similar for the corresponding Kdn-analogues. We conclude that the deactivating effect of incorporating an axial 3-fluoro substituent onto the sialic acid scaffold is comparable to the enhanced activation that occurs when the 4-methylumbelliferone leaving group is changed to the more nucleofugal fluoride ion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".