Roles played by 20-HETE, angiotensin II and endothelin in mediating the hypertension in aging female spontaneously hypertensive rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prevalence of hypertension (HT) increases in women after menopause, and there is evidence that HT is not as well controlled in postmenopausal women as men. The reasons for this are not clear but may be related to the lack of adequate blockade of the systems contributing to HT in women. This study aimed to determine the roles of three of the systems known to contribute to HT in animal studies: angiotensin II (ANG II; enalapril inhibitor), eicosanoids [1-aminobenzotriazole (1-ABT) inhibitor], and endothelin (ET(A) receptor antagonist), on blood pressure (BP) in three groups of female spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), aged 18 mos (postmenopausal rat, PMR). After baseline telemetry BP, three drug periods were performed for 5 days each: single blockade (ABT or enalapril), double blockade (ABT+enalapril or enalapril+ABT), and triple blockade (all 3 drugs). Controls received no treatment until the third period when they received ET(A) receptor antagonist alone. Single drug blockade reduced BP in PMR to similar levels. Double blockade reduced mean arterial pressure more in ABT+enalapril rats than in the other group (enalapril+ABT). Triple drug blockade reduced BP to similar levels in both groups, but the BP remained ∼110 mmHg. The data suggest that these three systems, ANG II, eicosanoids, and endothelin, contribute together and independently to BP control in old female SHR. However, other systems also contribute to the HT since the BP was not normalized, supporting the notion that HT in postmenopausal women may require complex multidrug therapy to be better controlled and that may require the development of additional drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".