Research on Perfecting the Rural Social Endowment Insurance System in Yangtze River Delta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: This paper analysis and summary rural endowment insurance and the typical model of the Yangtze River Delta region , from the cover, government subsidies and the level of treatment and other aspects rural pension insurance of the Yangtze River Delta region in China and the existing problems in the implementation. Methods: Construct the Yangtze River Delta new rural endowment insurance system based on urban-rural integration; calculate through the establishment of new agricultural insurance system balance model, analysis the balance of new plan.Results: The new rural endowment insurance system designed in this paper cover the allied farmers, land expropriated farmers and urban residents and other free occupation. It implements the work method of the government and the insured voluntary combination, and takes the mode of" individual account pension + basic pension +society as a whole".Discussion: Improve the funding model and fund management of the Yangtze River Delta new rural endowment insurance system. Straighten the management services of the Yangtze River Delta region rural endowment insurance system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".