MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133702739 · doi:10.1109/tnn.2002.1031938

A recurrent neural network for solving Sylvester equation with time-varying coefficients

2002· article· en· W2133702739 on OpenAlexaff
Yunong Zhang, Danchi Jiang, Jun Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsiNano Medical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecurrent neural networkArtificial neural networkComputer scienceSylvester equationControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemConvergence (economics)Inverted pendulumApplied mathematicsTime delay neural networkMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents a recurrent neural network for solving the Sylvester equation with time-varying coefficient matrices. The recurrent neural network with implicit dynamics is deliberately developed in the way that its trajectory is guaranteed to converge exponentially to the time-varying solution of a given Sylvester equation. Theoretical results of convergence and sensitivity analysis are presented to show the desirable properties of the recurrent neural network. Simulation results of time-varying matrix inversion and online nonlinear output regulation via pole assignment for the ball and beam system and the inverted pendulum on a cart system are also included to demonstrate the effectiveness and performance of the proposed neural network.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations660
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Neural NetworksSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207