MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133720355 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl554

Ciprofloxacin-induced ANCA-negative cutaneous and renal vasculitis--resolution with drug withdrawal

2006· letter· en· W2133720355 on OpenAlexaff
Leroy Storsley, Laurette Geldenhuys

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2006
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVasculitis and related conditions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCutaneous VasculitisCiprofloxacinVasculitisDrug withdrawalANCA-Associated VasculitisDrugInternal medicineImmunologyDermatologyAntibioticsMicrobiologyPharmacologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sir, A 50-year-old male with a history of hypertension underwent cystoscopy for gross haematuria. A bladder tumour was resected cystoscopically, and subsequently proved to be benign. He presented one week later with fever, delirium and right-sided flank pain. He was admitted with a diagnosis of urosepsis, and treated with ampicillin and gentamicin intravenously. His clinical condition rapidly improved, and was discharged 4 days later on oral ciprofloxacin. Ten days after discharge, he developed a skin rash on his legs. The rash was an initially red, palpable purpura that progressed to purplish lesions that ultimately ulcerated. He had no other symptoms suggestive of systemic vasculitis. The patient was started on a tapering dose of oral prednisone for what was felt to represent a cutaneous vasculitis, and his ciprofloxacin was discontinued after 10 days of therapy. His rash improved significantly, with the ulcerative lesions healing over the course of the next 1 month, and the steroids were discontinued.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0130.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicVasculitis and related conditionsFrench-language works237,207