MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133732451 · doi:10.1109/icip.2004.1421861

Image segmentation as regularized clustering: a fully global curve evolution method

2005· article· en· W2133732451 on OpenAlexaff
Carlos Vázquez, Amar Mitiche, Ismail Ben Ayed

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImage segmentationCluster analysisPartition (number theory)SegmentationSegmentation-based object categorizationEnergy functionalMathematicsScale-space segmentationArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)MinificationComputer scienceAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematical optimizationMathematical analysisCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study is to investigate image segmentation from the viewpoint of image data regularized clustering. From this viewpoint, segmentation into a fixed but arbitrary number N of regions is stated as the simultaneous minimization of N - 1 energy functional, each involving a single region and its complement. The resulting Euler-Lagrange curve evolution equations yield a partition at convergence provided the curves are initialized so as to define an arbitrary partition of the image domain. The method is implemented via level sets, and results are shown on synthetic and natural vectorial images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207