MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133776895 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2007.915831

An Investigation on the Nondetection Zones of Synchronous Distributed Generation Anti-Islanding Protection

2008· article· en· W2133776895 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIslanding Detection in Power Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslandingInterconnectionDistributed generationComputer scienceKey (lock)Power-system protectionElectrical engineeringReliability engineeringElectric power systemEngineeringTelecommunicationsPower (physics)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anti-islanding protection is an important technical requirement when interconnecting distributed generators. Unfortunately, most anti-islanding protection schemes cannot detect islanding situations under certain system operating conditions - there are nondetection zones within which anti-islanding protection schemes are ineffective. This paper investigates these nondetection zones associated with the common anti-islanding protection schemes of synchronous distributed generators: frequency and voltage-based relays. Moreover, the characteristics of the nondetection zones and the key factors that influence them are analyzed. The results are useful for utility companies and distributed generators owners to design and to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-islanding protection schemes proposed for various distributed generation interconnection projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it