Differences in proteoglycan deposition in the airways of moderate and severe asthmatics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Excess deposition of proteoglycans (PGs) has been described in the subepithelial layer of the asthmatic airway wall. However, less is known about deposition in the airway smooth muscle (ASM) layer, and whether the pattern of deposition is altered depending upon disease severity. Endobronchial biopsies were performed in patients with severe or moderate asthma (defined using American Thoracic Society criteria) and in control subjects. Biopsies were immunostained for the PGs biglycan, lumican, versican and decorin. PG deposition was measured in the subepithelial and ASM layers, the former by calculating the area of positive staining, and the latter by determining the percentage area stained using point counting. Immunostaining for PGs was prominent in biopsies from both moderate and severe asthmatics, compared with control subjects. While there was no difference in the amount of PG in the subepithelial layer between the two asthmatic groups, the percentage area of biglycan and lumican staining in the ASM layer was significantly greater in moderate versus severe asthmatics. Differences in the deposition of proteoglycans within the airway smooth muscle layer of moderate versus severe asthmatics potentially impact on the functional behaviour of the airway smooth muscle in these two groups of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".