MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation on microstructural properties of transient liquid phase (TLP) bonded IN-738LC superalloy with AMS 4776 filler metal

2013· article· en· W2133805012 on OpenAlexaff
Vahid Jalilvand, Hamid Omidvar, Mohammad Reza Rahimipour, H.R. Shakeri

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Science and Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHigh Temperature Alloys and Creep
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceEutectic systemIsothermal processSuperalloyIntermetallicMetallurgyMicrostructureDiffusionPrecipitationAlloyMelting pointLiquid metalComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the present study, microstructural evolutions at the joint region of transient liquid phase bonded IN-738LC superalloy were examined. The experiments were carried out at 1100°C with different holding times using Ni–B–Si–Cr–Fe filler alloy, AMS 4776, with B and Si as the melting point depressant elements. It was found that insufficient isothermal solidification of liquated insert caused the formation of continuous centreline eutectic phases. The width of the eutectic decreased with the increase in holding time. Complete isothermal solidification, which precluded the formation of the centreline eutectic, occurred within 45 min of holding time. In addition to the centreline eutectic products, precipitation of boron rich particles was observed at the diffusion affected zone. Homogenisation of isothermally solidified joints at 1120°C for 300 min resulted in the elimination of intermetallic phases formed at the diffusion affected zone and formation of significant γ′ precipitates in the joint region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials Science and TechnologySame topicHigh Temperature Alloys and CreepFrench-language works237,207