MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133809426 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.286

Hardware Implementation of the Salsa20 and Phelix Stream Ciphers

2007· article· en· W2133809426 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceStream cipherParallel computingComputer architectureCryptographyEmbedded systemComputer hardwareAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present an analysis of the digital hardware implementation of two stream ciphers proposed for the eSTREAM project: Salsa20 and Phelix. Both high speed and compact designs are examined, targeted to both field programmable (FPGA) and application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) technologies. The studied designs are specified using the VHDL hardware description language, and synthesized by using Synopsys CAD tools. The throughput of the compact ASIC design for Phelix is 260 Mbps targeted for 0.18 mu CMOS technology and the corresponding area is equivalent to about 12,400 2-input NAND gates. The throughput of Salsa20 ranges from 38 Mbps for the compact FPGA design, implemented using 194 CLB slices to 4.8 Gbps for the high speed ASIC design, implemented with an area equivalent to about 470,000 2-input NAND gates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.736
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it