MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133830921 · doi:10.14430/arctic4371

Harold Innis and the North: Appraisals and Contestations, edited by William J. Buxton

2014· article· en· W2133830921 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Doug Owram

Bibliographic record

VenueARCTIC · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies of British Isles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental ethicsGeographyHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lovecraft amplify these and similar comments in the final section of the book, to advocate academic settings as those where stakeholders can best share ideas in a neutral setting, to form "Communities of Practice" (Section 9:685-688).That proposition alone should earn this book shelf space in many institutional libraries.REFERENCES Albert, T.F.2001.The influence of Harry Brower, Sr., an Iñupiaq Eskimo hunter, on the Bowhead Whale Research Program conducted at the UIC-NARL facility by the North Slope Borough.In: Norton, D.W., ed.Fifty more years below zero: Tributes and meditations for the Naval Arctic Research

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.945
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.010
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueARCTICSame topicHistorical Studies of British IslesFrench-language works237,207