MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133843954 · doi:10.1109/tnb.2004.837901

Complex Permittivity Measurement as a New Noninvasive Tool for Monitoring In Vitro Tissue Engineering and Cell Signature Through the Detection of Cell Proliferation, Differentiation, and Pretissue Formation

2004· article· en· W2133843954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtracellular matrixOsteoblastCell growthMaterials scienceTissue engineeringBiomedical engineeringBiophysicsChemistryIn vitroBiologyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In in vitro tissue engineering, microporous scaffolds are commonly used to promote cell proliferation and differentiation in three-dimensional structures. Classic measurement methods are particularly time consuming, difficult to handle, and destructive. In this study, a new nondestructive method based on complex permittivity measurement (CPM) is proposed to monitor and track the osteoblast and macrophage differentiation through their morphological variation upon cell attachment and proliferation inside the microporous scaffolds. CPM is performed using a vector network analyzer and a dielectric probe under sterile conditions in a laminar-flow hood. A suitable effective medium approximation (EMA) is applied to fit the data in order to extract the parameters of the different constituents. Our data show that the EMA depolarization factor can be monitored to assess the variation of cell morphology characterizing cell attachment. Discrimination between two batches of scaffolds seeded, respectively, with 2 million and 1 million osteoblast cells is possible; the ratio of their CPM-derived cell volume fractions is in agreement with the ratio of their cell seeding numbers. In addition, cell proliferation inside scaffolds seeded with osteoblasts cultured in alpha minimum essential medium and inside scaffolds seeded with osteoblasts cultured in alpha minimum essential medium supplemented to induce the formation of extracellular matrix is monitored via CPM over several days. CPM-determined cell volume fraction is compared to DNA assay cell counts. Extracellular matrix formation and cell presence was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy. A set of three signature parameters (epsilon'mem, epsilon'cyt, kappa'cyt) characteristic of cell line is extracted from CPM. Distinct signatures are recorded for osteoblasts and macrophages, thus confirming the ability of CPM to discriminate between different cell types. This study demonstrates the potential of CPM as a diagnostic tool to monitor quickly and noninvasively cell growth and differentiation inside microporous scaffolds. Our findings suggest that the use of CPM could be extended to many biomedical applications, such as drug detection and automation of tissue and bacterial cultures in bioreactors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.600
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it