Hypothesis 2. Depression increases the risk for coronary heart disease in established diabetes.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clouse RE, Lustman PJ, Freedland KE, Griffith LS, McGill JB, Carney RM: Depression and coronary heart disease in women with diabetes. Psychosom Med 65:376–383, 2003 Prospective population-based studies demonstrate that, among individuals without known coronary heart disease (CHD), those who are depressed are more likely to have a myocardial infarction (MI) or die from cardiovascular disease than those without depression.12 Clouse et al. hypothesized that depression plays a similar role in the clinical presentation of CHD in individuals with diabetes. Women were selected as the focus of their study because of the high prevalence and aggressive course of CHD in women with diabetes. The study involved 76 women who composed the female subset of participants recruited and interviewed in 1982 for a study of the interrelationship of diabetes and psychiatric illness. The mean age of the subjects was 41.3 years, with a mean duration of diabetes of 12.4 years. Both type 1 (44.7%) and type 2 (55.3%) diabetic patients were enrolled. The majority …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it