MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133866328 · doi:10.1145/1023756.1023775

A framework of secure location service for position-based ad hoc routing

2004· article· en· W2133866328 on OpenAlexafffund
Joo-Han Song, Vincent W. S. Wong, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolRouting protocolWireless Routing ProtocolLink-state routing protocolWireless ad hoc networkDynamic Source RoutingDistributed computingInterior gateway protocolAd hoc wireless distribution serviceZone Routing ProtocolDestination-Sequenced Distance Vector routingComputer securityRouting (electronic design automation)WirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In large and dense mobile ad hoc networks, position-based routing protocols can offer significant performance improvement over topology-based routing protocols by using location information to make forwarding decisions. However, so far security issues in position-based routing protocols has not been widely considered. In this paper, we identify several security problems of position-based routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. To avoid these problems, we propose the Secure Grid Location Service (SGLS), which enhances the original GLS protocol with secure features. Countermeasures employed by SGLS against feasible attacks use both a broadcast authentication protocol and a reputation system for monitoring. Simulation results showed that SGLS can detect and isolate message dropping attackers efficiently.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207