MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133897132 · doi:10.1109/isic.2004.1387664

A robust PD-type evolutionary learning control for nonlinear time-varying systems

2005· article· en· W2133897132 on OpenAlexaff
P. R. Ouyang, Wenjun Zhang, Madan M. Gupta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInitializationControl theory (sociology)Feed forwardIterative learning controlNonlinear systemSliding mode controlTracking errorComputer scienceScheme (mathematics)Robust controlRobustness (evolution)Control (management)MathematicsControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A robust PD-type evolutionary learning control (PD-ELC) is proposed for the tracking problem of a class of nonlinear time-varying system. The proposed PD-ELC scheme is a combination of PD feedback control and feedforward control using the previous control input profiles in an iteration mode, so it is an on-line learning control. It can deal with the uncertainty of the initial state and initial output error during the iterations. The uniform boundary of the tracking error is established in the presence of the initialization error. The proposed control scheme has a simple and straightforward control structure that leads to its easy implementation. The effectiveness of the proposed PD-ELC is demonstrated through simulation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207