MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133909138 · doi:10.1002/qj.49712657013

Internal wave reflection in uniform shear

2000· article· en· W2133909138 on OpenAlexaff
Bruce Sutherland

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWave packetPhysicsInternal waveAmplitudeMechanical waveMechanicsShear flowLongitudinal waveWave propagationLove waveDispersion (optics)Reflection (computer programming)Surface waveWave shoalingMean flowGravity waveClassical mechanicsTurbulenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract If nonhydrostatic internal waves are of sufficiently large amplitude, they undergo significant dispersion due to interactions between the waves and wave‐induced mean flow. The effect of these interactions is investigated for internal waves propagating upward in a uniformly stratified Boussinesq flow with uniform shear. The sign of the shear is established so that the wave intrinsic frequency increases as the wave packet propagates upward; hence linear theory predicts that the waves should reflect at some level. Fully nonlinear numerical simulations of two‐dimensional wave packets are performed to study the wave‐packet evolution as a function of the initial amplitude and spatial extent of the wave packet. It is shown that if the waves are horizontally periodic, and of sufficiently large amplitude, momentum is permanently deposited to the mean flow at altitudes near, but below, the reflecting level predicted by linear theory. If the waves are horizontally compact, the waves propagate upward well above the reflection level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.699
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFrench-language works237,207