Channel Formation by the Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored Protein Binding Toxin Aerolysin Is Not Promoted by Lipid Rafts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins may be concentrated in membrane microdomains (lipid rafts) that are also enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids. The glycosyl anchor of these proteins is a specific, high affinity receptor for the channel-forming protein aerolysin. We wished to determine if the presence of rafts promotes the activity of aerolysin. Treatment of T lymphocytes with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin, which destroys lipid rafts by sequestering cholesterol, had no measurable effect on the sensitivity of the cells to aerolysin; nor did similar treatment of erythrocytes decrease the rate at which they were lysed by the toxin. We also studied the rate of aerolysin-induced channel formation in liposomes containing glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored placental alkaline phosphatase, which we show is a receptor for aerolysin. In liposomes containing sphingolipids as well as glycerophospholipids and cholesterol, most of the enzyme was Triton X-100-insoluble, indicating that it was localized in rafts, whereas in liposomes prepared without sphingolipids, all of the enzyme was soluble. Aerolysin was no more active against liposomes containing rafts than against those that did not. We conclude that lipid rafts do not promote channel formation by aerolysin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".