MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<i>Mesenchytraeus antaeus</i>, a new giant enchytraeid (Annelida, Clitellata) from the temperate rainforest of British Columbia, Canada, with a revised diagnosis of the genus <i>Mesenchytraeus</i>

2000· article· en· W2133911881 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emilia Rota, Ralph O. Brinkhurst

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Zoology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversità degli Studi di Siena
KeywordsChaetaClitellataBiologyAppendagePluvialisAnatomyGenusZoologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mesenchytraeus antaeus sp. n., an unpigmented giant enchytraeid inhabiting Carmanah valley (48°37′N, 124°44′W), Vancouver Island, is described. With its 102–127 segments and the size of fixed specimens reaching 61×2.9 mm (diameter maximal at midbody), this species qualifies as one of the largest members of the Clitellata family. The body wall comprises: a surprisingly thin cuticle (0.002 mm), the epidermis (0.02–0.04 mm), circular muscles (0.02 mm), plus thick longitudinal muscles (eight‐layered, totally 0.16–0.18 mm) divided into seven unequal fields. The chaetae are grouped in bundles of two to seven but show some unusual traits which suggest interesting convergences with the lumbricids. For instance, the most lateral chaeta in a bundle is always the largest; the larger chaetae exceed in length one‐third of a millimetre; the ectal tips of the chaetae are oriented in opposite directions in the anterior and posterior halves of the body. The spermathecal pores are prominent and open laterally in the middle of V, an unprecedented location among enchytraeids. The nature of the spermathecal ampullae (free, diverticulate and greatly elongate) indicates a close relationship to a group of species that seems to be confined to the Pacific coast of North America and the Arctic coast of Siberia. This amphi‐Beringean lineage includes other gigantic forms such as M. harrimani Eisen, 1904 and M. maculatus Eisen, 1904, from which, however, M. antaeus is clearly differentiated by the lack of pigmentation, the different size distribution of the chaetae within bundles, and the unique arrangement of the male apparatus. The latter includes unusually long sperm funnels (extending over 10 segments) and two groups of large accessory glands opening through two circular papillae at the base of each penial bulb, independently of the penial pores. All other congeners known to possess this type of glands (e.g. M. franciscanus Eisen, 1904) are at most only half as large as M. antaeus . The chaetal muscles of M. antaeus are heavily infested by encysted nematodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.163
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of ZoologySame topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207