MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2133919692 · doi:10.1109/ias.2005.1518721

A new single stage power factor corrected three level resonant AC/DC converter with and without active current control

2005· article· en· W2133919692 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammed Agamy, Praveen Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005. · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAC powerPower factorCurrent (fluid)Power (physics)Stage (stratigraphy)Control theory (sociology)Electrical engineeringPhysicsSingle stageVoltageComputer scienceControl (management)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new single-stage power factor correction converter based on a three-level LCC resonant topology that is suitable for high power applications and universal input voltage (90-265 Vrms) is proposed. It integrates the pulse width modulated (PWM) boost pre-regulators and variable frequency resonant circuits giving a variable frequency asymmetrical PWM (VFAPWM) resonant circuit operation. This regulates the output voltage, obtains a sinusoidal input current at near unity power factor and regulates the DC bus voltage to a controlled level leading to reduced switch ratings, therefore, improving the efficiency. Zero-voltage-switching is achieved for wide ranges of input voltage and loading. The circuit is studied in both continuous and discontinuous conduction modes. Simulation results for a 48 V, 2.3 kW, three-level half -bridge resonant converter operating at an input voltage of 90-265 Vrms and overall resonant frequency of 770 kHz, verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFourtieth IAS Annual Meeting. Conference Record of the 2005 Industry Applications Conference, 2005.Same topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207