MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Improved Primer Design for Multiplex PCR Analysis of Vancomycin-Resistant <b>spp</b>

2001· letter· es· W2133934438 on OpenAlexaff
Sameer Elsayed, Nina L. Hamilton, David A. Boyd, Michael R. Mulvey

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2001
Typeletter
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimer (cosmetics)Multiplex polymerase chain reactionBiologyMultiplexPolymerase chain reaction16S ribosomal RNAMolecular biologyMicrobiologyGene sequenceRibosomal RNAGeneVirologyGeneticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kariyama and colleagues (5) recently described a multiplex PCR method for the detection of the vanA,vanB, vanC1, and vanC2/C3 genes, in addition to primers for the detection of the ddl genes ofEnterococcus faecalis and E. faecium and of 16S rRNA (PCR control). However, the vanB primers used by these authors were derived from the sequence of the vanB1 subtype (1) and are incapable of detecting vanB2 orvanB3 subtypes, as previously described (2, 4, 7) and recently demonstrated in our laboratories.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.008
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations61
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207