La représentation des avant-gardes à la Semaine internationale demusique actuelle (Montréal, 1961)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les avant-gardes des années 50 et 60 ont été marquées par l’appropriation de la technologie à des fins créatives. Elles visaient également la démocratisation de l’art en favorisant la participation simultanée de plusieurs intervenants et de diverses formes artistiques, d’une part, et en désinvestissant le créateur du pouvoir décisionnel absolu, d’autre part. La Semaine internationale de musique actuelle, organisée par Pierre Mercure à Montréal en 1961, exemplifie ces aspects par le recours à la multidisciplinarité et à la musique électroacoustique, alors en plein essor. Elle accueillait donc certains des plus illustres représentants de l’avant-garde mondiale d’alors, en musique surtout, mais également en danse, en cinéma et en arts visuels, et ce, malgré les contraintes économiques de l’époque, qui ont pourtant eu un impact sur la provenance des œuvres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".