MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134001407 · doi:10.7202/1014605ar

La représentation des avant-gardes à la Semaine internationale demusique actuelle (Montréal, 1961)

2013· article· fr· W2134001407 on OpenAlex
Johanne Rivest

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian University Music Review · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLiterature, Musicology, and Cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les avant-gardes des années 50 et 60 ont été marquées par l’appropriation de la technologie à des fins créatives. Elles visaient également la démocratisation de l’art en favorisant la participation simultanée de plusieurs intervenants et de diverses formes artistiques, d’une part, et en désinvestissant le créateur du pouvoir décisionnel absolu, d’autre part. La Semaine internationale de musique actuelle, organisée par Pierre Mercure à Montréal en 1961, exemplifie ces aspects par le recours à la multidisciplinarité et à la musique électroacoustique, alors en plein essor. Elle accueillait donc certains des plus illustres représentants de l’avant-garde mondiale d’alors, en musique surtout, mais également en danse, en cinéma et en arts visuels, et ce, malgré les contraintes économiques de l’époque, qui ont pourtant eu un impact sur la provenance des œuvres.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it