MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134012606 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2007.365

Depth Measurement and 3D Metric Reconstruction from Two Uncalibrated Stereo Images

2007· article· en· W2134012606 on OpenAlexaff
Hendrika Kuffar, Kunio Takaya

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Vision and Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpipolar geometryRANSACFundamental matrix (linear differential equation)Computer visionArtificial intelligenceParallaxComputer scienceMetric (unit)Computer stereo visionStereopsisStereo imageStereo camerasObject (grammar)View synthesisStereo cameraStability (learning theory)Point (geometry)MathematicsImage (mathematics)GeometryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates the use of the epipolar geometry to estimate the depth (distance) to a point on the object structure in a pair of stereo images. The well established robust method of RANSAC was implemented to calculate the fundamental matrix. The paper discusses how to calculate the disparity, a parallax that exists in the stereo images. This paper is generally in the nature of following up the existing technology, but addresses the stability issue of the RANSAC fundamental matrix algorithm as a stepping stone for stable generation of the dense disparity maps useful for applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Vision and ImagingFrench-language works237,207