MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2134063173 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20047119

Mid-IR spectro-imaging observations with the ISOCAM CVF: Final reduction and archive

2005· article· en· W2134063173 on OpenAlexaff
F. Boulanger, R. Lorente, M. A. Miville Deschênes, A. Abergel, J. A. D. L. Blommaert, D. Cesarsky, K. Okumura, M. Pérault, W. T. Reach

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsZodiacal lightPhysicsAstronomyStarsGalaxyAstrophysicsPixelMilky WayData reductionAstrometrySkyRemote sensingOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mid-IR (5–m) Spectro-Imaging observations towards several hundred sky positions were obtained with the Infrared Space Observatory Camera (ISOCAM), and a Circular Variable Filter (CVF) that provided spectral resolution R = ~ 45 over a 3′ field (for 6, and 12´´ pixels, proportionally smaller for the observations carried with the 3, and 1.5´´ pixels). The wavelength range includes dust bands – in particular several of the aromatic carbon bands – fine structure lines from ionized gas, and H2 rotational lines. The observed fields comprise nearby and distant galaxies, Galactic and Extragalactic star forming regions, the Galactic diffuse emission, nearby molecular clouds, infrared cirrus, young stellar objects, evolved stars, and Solar System targets. We present the final data reduction procedure that improves on the standard pipeline reduction in several ways, mainly the subtraction of zodiacal light, that of stray light associated with the uniform, most often dominant, emission component and the correction of a pixel dependent wavelength shift. We also propose a correction of the largest astrometry errors introduced by the optics. We have processed most of the ISOCAM CVF observations and made the results available on the ISO archive for public use. The processed data may be routinely used over the full sensitivity range of the instrument down to a brightness as faint as a few % of the zodiacal emission. For extended emission, the CVF observations represent a data base with a lasting value which can serve many scientific goals and motivate follow-up observations in particular with the Spitzer Space Telescope spectrometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and Astrophysics→Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→