MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134066049 · doi:10.1093/plankt/24.7.687

Effect of Mesodinium rubrum (= Myrionecta rubra) on the action and absorption spectra of phytoplankton in a coastal marine inlet

2002· article· en· W2134066049 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margareth S. Kyewalyanga

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Plankton Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhytoplanktonPhotosynthesisBloomChlorophyll aOceanographyBotanyCiliatePlanktonAction spectrumBiologyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental chemistryEcologyChemistryNutrientGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study, carried out at a single station in the Bedford Basin (Nova Scotia, Canada), examined time-dependent changes in the physical and chemical conditions of the waters with associated changes in species composition and some photosynthesis properties of phytoplankton. The sampling period covered late summer months (August and September) and fall months (October to December). Changes in the water conditions were found to influence species composition, which in turn had an effect on the shapes and amplitudes of the action and absorption spectra of phytoplankton, and on the maximum quantum yield of photosynthesis. The most remarkable change was observed in October during a bloom of Mesodinium rubrum, a ciliate harbouring photosynthetic endosymbionts rich in phycobilins. The presence of M. rubrum yielded atypical shapes of the measured photosynthetic action spectra; furthermore, other photosynthesis properties changed significantly. These results demonstrate that the presence of certain pigments in the water column may be associated with a marked shift from what may be considered typical (representative) photosynthesis properties of phytoplankton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Plankton ResearchSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207