MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134087935 · doi:10.1142/s0218126610006232

WEIGHTED NEIGHBORHOOD CLASSIFIER FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF IMBALANCED TUMOR DATASET

2010· article· en· W2134087935 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Circuits Systems and Computers · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassifier (UML)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceGene selectionSubclassMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Support vector machineData miningGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine learning is widely applied to gene expression profiles based molecular tumor classification, but sample imbalance problem is often overlooked. This paper proposed a subclass-weighted neighborhood classifier to address the imbalanced sample set problem and a novel neighborhood rough set model to select informative genes for classification performance improvement. Experiments on three publicly available tumor datasets demonstrated that the proposed method is obviously effective on imbalanced dataset with obscure boundary between two subtypes and informative gene selection and it can achieve higher cross-validation accuracy with much fewer tumor-related genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.964
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it