MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134094228 · doi:10.3747/co.21.1695

Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Originating from Urachus—Case Report and Review of the Literature

2014· article· en· W2134094228 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anil Agrawal, Piotr Bobiński, Zygmunt Grzebieniak, Jerzy Rudnicki, Grzegorz Marek, P. Kobielak, Michał Kazanowski, Siddarth Agrawal, Agnieszka Hałoń

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Oncology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPseudomyxoma peritoneiMedicineAppendixUrachusPathologyLesionRare diseaseDiseaseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pseudomyxoma peritonei (pmp) is a rare clinical condition defined as extensive intraperitoneal spread of mucus associated with a variety of mucinous tumours of varying biologic behavior. Although appendix or ovaries have usually been implicated as the primary site, cases have been reported in association with neoplastic lesions of other sites. Pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from urachal remnants is a unique entity, reported only 18 times in the English literature thus far. Considering the rarity of the lesion, we report the case of a 50-year-old man surgically treated for pmp associated with a low-grade mucinous urachal neoplasm. Unique aspects of case are the low histologic aggressiveness of the causative lesion (reported only twice worldwide) and the early stage of the disease, with a relatively small amount of intraperitoneal free mucin. Review of the literature about pmp in general and a collation of previously reported cases of pmp originating from the urachus are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0060.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent OncologySame topicIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal MalignanciesFrench-language works237,207