MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134121281 · doi:10.7202/057773ar

Perte de savoirs familiaux, nouvelle professionnalité du travail domestique, quels sont les liens avec le système productif?

2005· article· fr· W2134121281 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Monique Haicault

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'approche du travail domestique proposée ici s'appuie sur des observations qui mettent en relief l'intégration du travail domestique dans une conception holiste de la société. Une nouvelle configuration de composantes s'articule autour d'une fonction décisive, le management. Il étend la gestion domestique aux espaces publics et privés, aux temps sociaux de plus en plus contraignants et aux personnes elles-mêmes. L'excellence domestique est devenue une nécessité et une nouvelle identité des femmes. Si elle ne les conduit pas à s'unir contre le stress individuel, régulé une à une, elle leur apprend dans l'expérience quotidienne la capacité de décider et de concevoir une globalité détaillée. À terme, cette professionnalité pourrait les conduire à vouloir s'inscrire directement dans la construction, la décision et la gestion de l'espace public auquel elles font face chaque jour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207