MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134123330 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2011.6030491

Artificial neural network acceleration on FPGA using custom instruction

2011· article· en· W2134123330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Sensor and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkAccelerationComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayHardware accelerationLookup tableActivation functionHyperbolic functionFeedforward neural networkSpeedupRange (aeronautics)CORDICFeed forwardTable (database)Parallel computingArtificial intelligenceComputer hardwareControl engineeringEngineeringMathematicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the acceleration of a pre-trained feedforward artificial neural network executing on a NIOS II processor. Without the use of hardware acceleration, a feedforward artificial neural network spends much of its execution time on the calculation of the activation function between layers, in this case, the hyperbolic tangent function. A speedup of 4.36 was achieved via a custom instruction approximating the value of tanh(x) through the use of a range addressable lookup table.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Sensor and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207