MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

On the Use of Video Clips in College English Teaching

2010· article· en· W2134127006 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoning Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSubtitles and Audiovisual Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCLIPSCollege EnglishHumanitiesSociologyPedagogyPhilosophyPsychologyArtComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of video clips in college English teaching is of great significance and necessity and it has its own utilizing principle, yet not every college English teacher knows it, nor can they use them well. Combining the experience of my utilizing it and the students’ feedback., this paper studies its advantages and using principles. Key Words: the use of video clips, college English teaching, utilizing principle Resume: L’utilisation du videoclip dans l’enseignement de l’anglais a l’universite est d’une grande signification et necessite. D’ailleurs, elle a son propre principe d’utilisation. Mais tous les enseignants d’anglais ne le savent pas, ni l’emploient bien. En combinant ma propre experience et le feedbaclk des etudiants, l’auteur etudie les avantages de l’utilisation du videoclip et son principes d’emploi. Mots-Cles: utilisation du videoclip, enseignement de l’anglais

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicSubtitles and Audiovisual MediaFrench-language works237,207