MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134139721 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564759

Measuring the angle of a rotating link through compliant driving tendons

2008· article· en· W2134139721 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mark L. Guckert, Michael D. Naish

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobot Manipulation and Learning
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLink (geometry)TendonExtended Kalman filterPosition (finance)Kalman filterCoulomb frictionMotion (physics)Control theory (sociology)Computer sciencePhysicsArtificial intelligenceNonlinear systemAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measuring the position of a tendon-driven rotating link, based on the state of the tendons at the proximal end is challenging. Specifically, tendon elasticity and Coulomb friction can cause significant nonlinearities in the relationship between the motion at the proximal end of the tendon and the motion of the link. An extended Kalman filter (EKF) is proposed as a potential method to refine estimates of link position based on proximal measurements. A model link and tendon system is built to demonstrate the impact of these effects on measurement. Sensors are incorporated to allow direct measurement of the link position in addition to the motion of the tendons at their origins. A dynamic model is developed for the resulting system and used in conjunction with an EKF to generate improved estimates of the linkpsilas motion based on proximal measurements alone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicRobot Manipulation and LearningFrench-language works237,207