MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134150982 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2008.4738824

Stabilization of closed sets for passive systems, part II: Passivity-based control

2008· article· en· W2134150982 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamed I. El-Hawwary, Manfredi Maggiore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Stability of Dynamical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassivityControl theory (sociology)Stability theoryExponential stabilityInvariant (physics)Computer scienceSet (abstract data type)Closed loopStability (learning theory)Work (physics)Control (management)MathematicsControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we explore the stabilization of closed invariant sets for passive systems, and present conditions under which a passivity-based feedback makes the set stable, semi-attractive, or semi-asymptotically stable for the closed-loop system. Our results rely on novel reduction principles, presented in Part I of this work. As an application of the theory, we present a coordination problem for two unicycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl and Stability of Dynamical SystemsFrench-language works237,207