MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134154432 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2008.918198

Statistics of 2-D DT-CWT Coefficients for a Gaussian Distributed Signal

2008· article· en· W2134154432 on OpenAlexaff
Sejuti Rahman, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsComplex wavelet transformGaussianProbability density functionWaveletMonte Carlo methodHilbert transformStatisticsApplied mathematicsAlgorithmWavelet transformDiscrete wavelet transformSpectral densityComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the statistical properties of the two-dimensional dual-tree complex wavelet transform (DT-CWT) coefficients of a Gaussian distributed signal both in the Cartesian and polar forms. The first level of decomposition of the DT-CWT uses the wavelet filters that form only an approximate Hilbert-pair, while those at the higher levels form almost an exact Hilbert-pair. Hence, a significant correlation exists between the quadrature-filtered coefficients of the two trees in the first level of decomposition as compared to the other levels. As a consequence, in the Cartesian representation, the real and imaginary components of the complex coefficients are modeled as independent zero-mean Gaussian having unequal variances for the first level of decomposition and equal variances for the higher levels. In the polar representation, the magnitude components are modeled by a generalized Gamma probability density function (PDF) for the first-level decomposition and a Rayleigh PDF for the higher levels. The corresponding phase components are modeled by an analytic PDF. The Monte Carlo simulations show that the proposed PDFs of the transform coefficients match very well with the empirical ones. It is shown that the moments of the corresponding PDFs closely approximate the estimated sample moments. Finally, two techniques, namely, maximum a posteriori-based estimation and phase-based ridge detection are developed using the proposed PDFs. Simulation studies are carried out showing that the use of the proposed techniques provides improved estimation and detection performance of images in a noisy environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.640

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular PapersSame topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207