MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134160263 · doi:10.1109/icdsp.2009.5201139

A robust Dual Predictive Line Acoustic Noise Cancellers

2009· article· en· W2134160263 on OpenAlexafffund
Marwan A. Jaber, Daniel Massicotte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsActive noise controlComputer scienceNoise (video)Adaptive filterConvergence (economics)Interference (communication)Filter (signal processing)Noise measurementSpeech recognitionLine (geometry)Dual (grammatical number)Single antenna interference cancellationAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsNoise reductionMathematicsControl (management)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a robust adaptive algorithm for adjusting coefficients of an adaptive filter, which is used in active noise canceller (ANC). The filtered LMS algorithm, which is widely used in digital signal processing, is deployed to reduce the effect of acoustic interference in a noisy environment. In this paper the zero noise output of the proposed one and two stages dual predictive line ANC (DPL-ANC) algorithm, which could be deployed in underground communication system, is presented. A second DPL-ANC using voice activity detection (VAD) to control the updated filter coefficients is also proposed. Evaluation results with real-world underground and noisy speech data exhibit significant improvement on the convergence and the zero noise output of both proposed two stages DPL-ANC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207