Évaluation des ouvrages hydrauliques de génie civil
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reviews Cemagref (Centre national du machinisme agricole, du génie rural, des eaux et des forêts) research on assessment of hydraulic works, especially on their performance and safety. A generic functional model has been developed, using reliability methods, to represent the various mecanisms acting on different hydraulic works (gravity and embankment dams, fluvial dikes, etc.). Collecting and analyzing data on the failure of these works allowed us to define structural indicators and the rules for their assessment. Performance indicators for hydraulic works were created through multicriteria aggregation methods; various results were thus obtained. A database of knowledge relating to mechanisms and histories of dam ageing has been produced and constitutes a useful aid for consulting civil engineers. Methods and tools have been developed to assess the performance of fluvial dikes and to assist managers in planning maintenance operations. Similar research is under way on embankment dams and will provide a diagnosis tool for hydraulic works in operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it