Multisite, multifrequency tensor decomposition of magnetotelluric data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Accurate interpretation of magnetotelluric data requires an understanding of the directionality and dimensionality inherent in the data, and valid implementation of an appropriate method for removing the effects of shallow, small-scale galvanic scatterers on the data to yield responses representative of regional-scale structures. The galvanic distortion analysis approach advocated by Groom and Bailey has become the most adopted method, rightly so given that the approach decomposes the magnetotelluric impedance tensor into determinable and indeterminable parts, and tests statistically the validity of the galvanic distortion assumption. As proposed by Groom and Bailey, one must determine the appropriate frequency-independent telluric distortion parameters and geoelectric strike by fitting the seven-parameter model on a frequency-by-frequency and site-by-site basis independently. Although this approach has the attraction that one gains a more intimate understanding of the data set, it is rather time-consuming and requires repetitive application. We propose an extension to Groom-Bailey decomposition in which a global minimum is sought to determine the most appropriate strike direction and telluric distortion parameters for a range of frequencies and a set of sites. Also, we show how an analytically-derived approximate Hessian of the objective function can reduce the required computing time. We illustrate application of the analysis to two synthetic data sets and to real data. Finally, we show how the analysis can be extended to cover the case of frequency-dependent distortion caused by the magnetic effects of the galvanic charges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".