MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134184719 · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.1065.13.6

The <i>P2X7</i> Receptor Gene A1513C Polymorphism Does Not Contribute to Risk of Familial or Sporadic Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

2004· article· en· W2134184719 on OpenAlexaff
Gabrielle S. Sellick, Matthew Rudd, Paul D. Eve, Ruth Allinson, Estella Matutes, Daniel Catovsky, Richard S. Houlston

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChronic lymphocytic leukemiaOdds ratioAlleleGenotypingConfidence intervalGenotypeLeukemiaInternal medicineAllele frequencyImmunologyOncologyGeneticsBiologyMedicineGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The P2X7 receptor, a plasma membrane ATP-gated ion channel that plays a role in lymphocyte apoptosis, has been suggested to be involved in the development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). P2X7 is polymorphic with 1513A and 1513C alleles encoding fully active and nonfunctional proteins, respectively. We evaluated the significance of the P2X7-A1513C polymorphism on CLL risk by genotyping 424 patients and 428 healthy controls. To empower detection of an association, we included in our analysis 106 familial cases. Allele frequencies were identical in cases and controls irrespective of whether cases were familial or sporadic (frequency of the C allele was 0.17 and 0.17, respectively). The odds ratio of CLL associated with the C allele was 1.03 (95% confidence interval: 0.80-1.31). A meta-analysis of this study and five other smaller published studies provides no evidence of relationship between this P2X7 polymorphism and risk of CLL (odds ratio = 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.74-1.32).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & PreventionSame topicChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207