MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134202234 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2013.6572399

Analytic modeling of interconnect capacitance in submicron and nanometer technologies

2013· article· en· W2134202234 on OpenAlexaff
Gholamreza Shomalnasab, Howard M. Heys, Lihong Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitanceParasitic capacitanceCapacitive sensingComputationInterconnectionElectronic engineeringVery-large-scale integrationComputer scienceParasitic extractionElectrical capacitance tomographyElectronic circuitTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmElectrical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parasitic capacitance of interconnects in the analog and mixed-signal VLSI circuits can be modeled by using physics equations or empirical curve fitting. In this paper, we propose an analytical model for computing parasitic capacitance between interconnects on different layers or on the same layer. In our method, electric flux is approximated to model different capacitive components, which combine to determine the overall equivalent capacitance. We first derive a general template for the fringe capacitance based on fundamental electromagnetic principles, followed by a fitting technique in order to reach outstanding accuracy. Based on our approach that includes no complex operators, capacitance of typical interconnect geometries can be efficiently computed. The proposed model is verified in comparison with the extracted results derived from commercial tools. The experimental results show that our proposed method can best approach the extracted results yet with significantly reduced computation time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.160
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207