MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134221105 · doi:10.3917/docsi.481.0024

Fondements et enjeux

2011· article· fr· W2134221105 on OpenAlexaff
Patrice Noailles, Gilles Garel, Nicolás Moinet, Hervé Daniel, Alpha Diallo, Corinne Dupin

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumentaliste-Sciences de l Information · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le premier pôle de ce dossier dresse un panorama de la situation, en présentant les fondements et les enjeux de la veille pour l’innovation, en précisant quelques définitions nécessaires et en donnant quelques repères historiques. Contributions de Patrice Noailles (Seillans Investissement) : Quatre approches de l’innovation ; de Gilles Garel (CNAM-Lirsa) : Les défis de l'innovation contemporaine pour les entreprises ; de Hervé Daniel (Créativ) et Nicolas Moinet (IAE Poitiers) : Architecture d’un plan de veille au service d'une vision systémique de l'innovation ; et de Corinne Dupin et Alpha Diallo (Help management) : L’entreprise innovante : un espace privilégié de veille… et d’intelligence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.040
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumentaliste-Sciences de l InformationSame topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207