MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134245421 · doi:10.1109/test.1998.743214

Stimulus generation for built-in self-test of charge-pump phase-locked loops

2002· article· en· W2134245421 on OpenAlexaff
B.R. Veillette, Gordon W. Roberts

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharge pumpStimulus (psychology)Computer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringVoltagePsychologyEngineeringCapacitorCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the issue of the stimulation of charge-pump phase-locked loops for built-in self-test applications. It is shown that three nodes of the PLL qualify for test signal injection. The hardware and methodology for each are discussed. In particular, a comprehensive explanation of the use of delta-sigma modulation in the time domain is provided. Furthermore, implementation issues of analog tests with signal generation based on coarse quantization are discussed. The effects of the quantization noise arising from delta-sigma modulation on the dynamic range of phase-locked loop nodes is evaluated. Original experimental results validate one of the method which was not verified previously. In conclusion, the strengths and weakness of each of the three methods for phase-locked loop stimulation are highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207