MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134299232 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0266

Distinct Biological Roles for the Akt Family in Mammary Tumor Progression

2010· review· en· W2134299232 on OpenAlexafffund
Rachelle L. Dillon, William J. Muller

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of ManitobaOccupational Cancer Research Centre
FundersU.S. Public Health ServiceNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthTerry Fox FoundationCanadian Breast Cancer Research AllianceFondation du cancer du sein du QuébecCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Research Society
KeywordsAKT1AKT2Protein kinase BMetastasisCancer researchBiologyAKT3Tumor progressionCancerPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayGenetically modified mousePhenotypeMammary tumorKinaseBreast cancerTransgeneSignal transductionCell biologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phosphatidylinositol 3' kinase/Akt pathway is frequently dysregulated in cancer, which can have unfavorable consequences in terms of cell proliferation, survival, metabolism, and migration. Increasing evidence suggests that Akt1, Akt2, and Akt3 play unique roles in breast cancer initiation and progression. We have recently shown that in contrast to Akt1, which accelerates mammary tumor induction in transgenic mice, Akt2 promotes metastasis of tumor cells without affecting the latency of tumor development. Despite the distinct phenotypic outputs resulting from Akt1 or Akt2 activation, very little is known about the mode by which such unique functions originate from these highly related kinases. Here we discuss potential mechanisms contributing to the differing functional specificity of Akt1 and Akt2 with respect to migration, invasion, and metastasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancerFrench-language works237,207