MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134300587 · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1997.672620

The response of a gas proportional scintillation counter to conversion electrons: simulation and experimental results

2002· article· en· W2134300587 on OpenAlexaff
P.J.B.M. Rachinhas, P.C.P.S. Simões, J. A. M. Lopes, T.H.V.T. Dias, R.E. Morgado, J.M.F. dos Santos, F.P. Santos, J.F.C.A. Veloso, A D Stauffer, C.A.N. Conde

Bibliographic record

Venue1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersGraduate and Professional Student Council, University of Arizona
KeywordsMonte Carlo methodProportional counterPhysicsAnalyserScintillation counterXenonScintillationElectronAtomic physicsNuclear physicsComputational physicsOpticsDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monte Carlo and xenon gas proportional scintillation counter energy spectra are presented for the absorption of X-rays and conversion electrons from the decay of a Cd/sup 109/ source and its daughter Ag/sup 109m/. Pulse duration distributions are also calculated, and compared with the results measured with a digital pulse-height analyser. A good agreement is found for the Monte Carlo and the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue1997 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference RecordSame topicRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207