La « dignitàs mulieris » dans la littérature didactique féminine (du XVe au XVIIe siècle). Les enjeux idéologiques d’une appropriation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans les écrits didactiques féminins du XVe au XVIIe siècles (traités de morale mondaine à l'usage des princesses et dames de haut rang, conseils et instruction d'une mère à sa fille, guides dévotionnels), la représentation s'effectue par un jeu de miroirs. Les écrivaines ne remettent pas en question l'image de la femme idéale qui est déposée dans « le miroir des femmes », mais elles insistent tout particulièrement sur celles de ces vertus qui les réintégreront dans la sphère de dignité jusque-là réservée aux hommes. Ces femmes peuvent nous paraître aujourd'hui timides, prudentes, conservatrices. Toutefois, en soulignant « l'excellence du sexe », elles préparaient la voie à celles qui s'enhardiraient jusqu'à revendiquer le droit de la femme à l'étude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".