MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134329938 · doi:10.1002/cpa.20120

Long‐time dynamics of KdV solitary waves over a variable bottom

2006· article· en· W2134329938 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKorteweg–de Vries equationMathematicsVariable (mathematics)Bounded functionFunction (biology)Variable coefficientMathematical analysisNonlinear systemType (biology)Scale (ratio)Mathematical physicsPhysicsGeologyQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study the variable‐bottom, generalized Korteweg—de Vries (bKdV) equation ∂ t u = −∂ x (∂ u + f ( u ) − b ( t,x ) u ), where f is a nonlinearity and b is a small, bounded, and slowly varying function related to the varying depth of a channel of water. Many variable‐coefficient KdV‐type equations, including the variable‐coefficient, variable‐bottom KdV equation, can be rescaled into the bKdV. We study the long‐time behavior of solutions with initial conditions close to a stable, b = 0 solitary wave. We prove that for long time intervals, such solutions have the form of the solitary wave whose center and scale evolve according to a certain dynamical law involving the function b ( t,x ) plus an H 1 (ℝ)‐small fluctuation. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it