MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134359985 · doi:10.1109/acc.2007.4282202

Backstepping Guidance for Missiles Modeled as Uncertain Time-Varying First-Order Systems

2007· article· en· W2134359985 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGuidance and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacksteppingAccelerationControl theory (sociology)MissileBounded functionPursuerMissile guidanceNonlinear systemProportional navigationTrajectoryAerodynamicsComputer scienceKinematicsBallistic missileLyapunov functionGuidance systemMathematicsMathematical optimizationEngineeringControl (management)Adaptive controlArtificial intelligenceAerospace engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a Lyapunov-based guidance law, which takes into account the nonlinear relative kinematics between the missile and the target, and ensures ultimate boundedness of the missile-target system trajectories provided the estimation error of the target acceleration is bounded in magnitude. The proposed guidance synthesis, which combines high-gain backstepping and variable structure approach, takes into account the uncertain flight control dynamics. Numerical simulations of the proposed guidance in closed-loop with an interval 2 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">nd</sup> -order missile transfer function and a maneuvering target demonstrate satisfactory performances when compared to several other modern and classical guidance laws. Furthermore, it is shown that using the estimate of the target acceleration in the guidance allows achieving a relatively small miss distance when the pursuer-evader maximum maneuverability ratio approaches unity. However, the satisfactory performance comes at the expense of a stringent acceleration demand in the early part of the engagement, which is typical of high-gain control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it