MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2134408453 · doi:10.5539/mas.v4n8p114

Ynthesis and Characterization of Nonstructural MG2NI with Replacement Diffusion Method

2010· article· en· W2134408453 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yanqiu Jin, Xiuyun Yang, Yunhui Li, Wenjuan Zhang, Limin Wang, Yaoming Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHydrogen Storage and Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaPortland State University
KeywordsHigh-resolution transmission electron microscopyHydrogen storageMaterials scienceTransmission electron microscopyPowder diffractionDiffusionElectrochemistryDiffractionResolution (logic)Chemical engineeringCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)NanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialOpticsPhysical chemistryElectrodeChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonstructural Mg2Ni powder was prepared by replacement-diffusion method. The structure of the Mg2Ni powder was investigated by X-ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Crystallographic structure analysis showed that the synthesized sample powder was constituted with Mg2Ni and a small fraction of MgO. The TEM image in low-resolution indicated that the diameter of the synthesized Mg2Ni powder was in the range of 20~80 nm, and the high-resolution transmission electron microscope (HRTEM) image suggested that the interlinear spacing of (113) lattice planes was 0.229 nm, and the specific surface area examined was 50 m2 /g. The electrochemical hydrogen storage capacity of the Mg2Ni power was also measured in this work. It was 82.5 mAh g-1. The reasons of the low capacity hydrogen storage and decrepitating were analyzed, and the mainly cause were the grievous oxidation of the powder and the pulverization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicHydrogen Storage and MaterialsFrench-language works237,207